I spent 12 hours yesterday converting CD music to formats of FLAC, OGG,
MP3 and AACPlus. Programs used in the process are ExactAudioCopy,
BulkRename, MP3Tag, MediaCoder, and foobar2000. Most of the effort is
in editing and formatting tags. Net reduction with so many different
formats is only about 15%. And there's already hundreds of hours music
on my 60Gb iAudio I've not got around to hearing. (And my podcast
subscriptions -- oy vey!)
How absurd is this process, or so will it
seem in a few years with everyone able to get wireless broadband. Local
storage of music on mobile players will be replaced by on-demand access
to streaming content like what XM and Sirius Satellite already play --
or the In2TV streaming telly programs AOL just introduced. And yet
there's no sign of Apple preparing for a world where iPods will be
thought laughable fossils.
And we can be pretty sure the tag
information will be as accurate as what XM and Sirius now provide. In
fact, I suspect that the corrupted info in the online Gracenote and
freeDB services that is supposed to aid us is deliberately created to
enhance the appeal of subscription music or, at least, buying music
online.
I was in two of Manhattan's biggest CD stores the last few
days and it was so comically obvious that these stores are obsolete.
Indeed, I've little doubt Spitzer is right in saying online music
pricing has been set by monopoly conspiracy. How can one equate costs
of music on discs in a huge store with rent, staff, electricity, etc.
with the reduced form delivered by the iTunes store?
I believe a
price equating the two delivery forms would be 20 cents per download.
It's fairly clear that Tower Records isn't financing itself and I think
it most likely the RIAA and record companies are supporting the chain
as part of the conspiracy to maintain an inflated price structure for
music.
MP3 and AACPlus. Programs used in the process are ExactAudioCopy,
BulkRename, MP3Tag, MediaCoder, and foobar2000. Most of the effort is
in editing and formatting tags. Net reduction with so many different
formats is only about 15%. And there's already hundreds of hours music
on my 60Gb iAudio I've not got around to hearing. (And my podcast
subscriptions -- oy vey!)
How absurd is this process, or so will it
seem in a few years with everyone able to get wireless broadband. Local
storage of music on mobile players will be replaced by on-demand access
to streaming content like what XM and Sirius Satellite already play --
or the In2TV streaming telly programs AOL just introduced. And yet
there's no sign of Apple preparing for a world where iPods will be
thought laughable fossils.
And we can be pretty sure the tag
information will be as accurate as what XM and Sirius now provide. In
fact, I suspect that the corrupted info in the online Gracenote and
freeDB services that is supposed to aid us is deliberately created to
enhance the appeal of subscription music or, at least, buying music
online.
I was in two of Manhattan's biggest CD stores the last few
days and it was so comically obvious that these stores are obsolete.
Indeed, I've little doubt Spitzer is right in saying online music
pricing has been set by monopoly conspiracy. How can one equate costs
of music on discs in a huge store with rent, staff, electricity, etc.
with the reduced form delivered by the iTunes store?
I believe a
price equating the two delivery forms would be 20 cents per download.
It's fairly clear that Tower Records isn't financing itself and I think
it most likely the RIAA and record companies are supporting the chain
as part of the conspiracy to maintain an inflated price structure for
music.